Dahmer Review: A Disturbing Series You Can’t Shake Off
This Dahmer review comes with a warning, not because the show is bad, but because it’s heavy in ways most series aren’t. Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story doesn’t exist to thrill you or make crime look cool. It exists to make you uncomfortable, angry, and emotionally drained. And honestly, that’s exactly why it works.
In a world where true crime content is often consumed casually, Dahmer flips the script. It forces you to slow down and confront the ugliness behind the headlines. Watching this series feels less like entertainment and more like an experience you survive. It’s intense, deeply unsettling, and not something you casually recommend in a group chat without context.

Plot Breakdown: Horror Rooted in Reality
The plot follows the life and crimes of Jeffrey Dahmer, one of America’s most infamous serial killers. But instead of turning him into a myth or a monster-only figure, the series explores the system that allowed him to operate for years. The story doesn’t glorify violence; it exposes failure.
The narrative moves through different timelines, showing how Dahmer’s crimes escalated and how authorities repeatedly ignored warning signs. The plot constantly reminds you that this isn’t just about one man, but about racism, homophobia, and institutional negligence. It’s less about shock value and more about accountability.
Story Without Spoilers: Slow, Suffocating, Intentional
Without giving away details, Dahmer tells its story in a way that feels deliberately uncomfortable. The pacing is slow, almost suffocating, forcing you to sit in silence and dread. There’s no dramatic background score telling you when to feel scared. Instead, the fear creeps in quietly.
What’s striking is the perspective shift. The series often focuses on the victims and the people around Dahmer rather than the crimes themselves. This choice makes the story feel grounded and tragic instead of sensational. You’re not watching to guess what happens next, because you already know. You’re watching to understand how it happened at all.
Characters and Performances That Haunt You
Evan Peters as Jeffrey Dahmer delivers one of the most disturbing performances in recent television. His portrayal is restrained, cold, and terrifying without being over-the-top. He doesn’t rely on loud aggression; his stillness does the damage. It’s a performance that stays with you long after the episode ends.
Niecy Nash as Glenda Cleveland is the emotional soul of the series. Her performance is heartbreaking and enraging, representing the voices that were ignored for far too long. Richard Jenkins plays Lionel Dahmer, Jeffrey’s father, with painful complexity, showing guilt, denial, and confusion without excuses. Molly Ringwald as Shari Dahmer adds another layer to the fractured family dynamic.
Every actor feels grounded, which makes the series hit harder. No one feels like a caricature. Everyone feels painfully real.
What the Series Gets Right: Honesty Over Comfort
One of the biggest positives of Dahmer is its refusal to romanticize its subject. The show doesn’t make the killer charming or mysterious. Instead, it portrays him as deeply broken and disturbing. This approach sets it apart from many true crime dramas.
The writing is sharp and purposeful. Dialogues feel realistic, often awkward, and emotionally raw. The cinematography uses muted colors and claustrophobic framing, making even normal spaces feel threatening. The series also deserves credit for highlighting systemic failures without turning them into background noise.
Where It Falls Short: Emotionally Exhausting
As powerful as the show is, it’s not an easy watch. One of the main negatives is how emotionally draining it becomes. There are moments where the suffering feels relentless, and some viewers may feel overwhelmed or even numb.
Another criticism is the focus on Dahmer himself. While the series tries to center victims, the screen time still heavily revolves around the killer. This can feel uncomfortable, especially for viewers who feel true crime already gives too much attention to perpetrators.
Likeable and Not So Likeable Elements
What’s strangely likable, if that word even fits here, is the series’ integrity. It doesn’t try to please everyone. It sticks to its vision and accepts that it won’t be universally loved. The performances, especially Evan Peters and Niecy Nash, are undeniably strong and deserving of praise.
What’s not likable is how heavy it gets without offering emotional relief. There’s very little balance. No humor, no light moments, and no breathing space. For some, that makes the experience feel punishing rather than engaging.
Why Dahmer Feels Different
Dahmer feels like a response to how casually true crime is consumed online. It challenges the trend of turning real trauma into background content. The series asks you to sit with discomfort and question why these stories attract us in the first place.
This Dahmer review isn’t about recommending the show for fun. It’s about acknowledging its impact. It sparks conversations about privilege, policing, and whose lives are valued. It’s not something you forget easily, and maybe that’s the point.
Final Verdict: Powerful, Problematic, and Necessary
Dahmer is not a series you watch to relax. It’s a series you watch to confront reality. It’s disturbing, slow, and emotionally heavy, but it’s also honest and well-crafted. The performances elevate the material, and the storytelling refuses to take the easy route.
It’s not perfect. It’s uncomfortable in ways that raise ethical questions. But it also forces accountability and refuses to let the audience look away. Whether you love it or hate it, Dahmer leaves a mark.
If you choose to watch it, do so with awareness. This isn’t just another true crime series. It’s a reminder that behind every headline are real people, real failures, and real consequences. And that truth hits harder than any fictional horror ever could.